BTAL vs. GSY
BTAL (AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) and GSY (Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTAL is a Long-Short fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index, while GSY is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. BTAL is passively managed, while GSY is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, BTAL returned -5.05%/yr vs 2.86%/yr for GSY. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. BTAL charges 2.11%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for GSY.
Performance
BTAL vs. GSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -20.15% return, which is significantly lower than GSY's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BTAL has underperformed GSY with an annualized return of -5.05%, while GSY has yielded a comparatively higher 2.86% annualized return.
BTAL
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -20.15%
- 6M
- -19.27%
- 1Y
- -36.60%
- 3Y*
- -12.17%
- 5Y*
- -4.94%
- 10Y*
- -5.05%
GSY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
BTAL vs. GSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -20.15% | -20.17% | 12.83% | -15.11% | 20.48% | -6.81% | -13.86% | 1.07% | 15.13% | -2.13% |
GSY Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF | 1.72% | 4.96% | 5.95% | 5.99% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 1.88% | 3.39% | 2.18% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTAL and GSY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2011 | -0.03 |
BTAL vs. GSY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BTAL
GSY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
BTAL
GSY
Financial Services
BTAL
GSY
Industrials
BTAL
GSY
Consumer Cyclical
BTAL
GSY
Healthcare
BTAL
GSY
Real Estate
BTAL
GSY
Consumer Defensive
BTAL
GSY
Utilities
BTAL
GSY
Energy
BTAL
GSY
Basic Materials
BTAL
GSY
Communication Services
BTAL
GSY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTAL vs. GSY — Risk / Return Rank
BTAL
GSY
BTAL vs. GSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTAL | GSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -29.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 6.54 | -5.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 75.72 | -76.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 373.96 | -375.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTAL vs. GSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, which is greater than GSY's maximum drawdown of -12.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and GSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTAL | GSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.28% | -12.14% | -38.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.50% | -0.06% | -37.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.16% | -0.18% | -44.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.16% | -1.48% | -43.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.28% | -5.25% | -45.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.23% | 0.00% | -50.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.01% | -2.38% | -19.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.38% | 0.01% | +22.37% |
Volatility
BTAL vs. GSY - Volatility Comparison
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) at 0.15%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTAL | GSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 0.15% | +8.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 0.31% | +16.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 0.40% | +22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 0.58% | +18.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 1.22% | +16.11% |
BTAL vs. GSY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTAL has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than GSY's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTAL vs. GSY - Dividend Comparison
BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than GSY's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 3.11% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSY Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF | 4.34% | 4.56% | 5.31% | 4.95% | 1.70% | 0.58% | 1.45% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 1.80% | 1.21% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTAL and GSY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTAL has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to GSY (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -50.28% vs GSY's -12.14%.
On 10-year performance, GSY leads with 2.86% vs -5.05% for BTAL. On fees, GSY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, GSY has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GSY has performed better with a 2.86% return vs -5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.
GSY has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 3.11% for BTAL.
BTAL is categorized as Long-Short, while GSY is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: AGF and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 2.11% for BTAL and 0.22% for GSY.
GSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.20 vs -1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTAL and GSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer