BTAL vs. FICO
BTAL (AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) is Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AGF, while FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BTAL returned -4.60%/yr vs 26.66%/yr for FICO. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BTAL vs. FICO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -15.84% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -25.24% return. Over the past 10 years, BTAL has underperformed FICO with an annualized return of -4.60%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively higher 26.66% annualized return.
BTAL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.49%
- 6M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- -15.84%
- 1Y
- -25.57%
- 3Y*
- -9.44%
- 5Y*
- -4.30%
- 10Y*
- -4.60%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.86%
FICO
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 15.26%
- 6M
- -19.36%
- YTD
- -25.24%
- 1Y
- -18.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 18.50%
- 10Y*
- 26.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.55%
BTAL vs. FICO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -15.84% | -20.17% | 12.83% | -15.11% | 20.48% | -6.81% | -13.86% | 1.07% | 15.13% | -2.13% |
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -25.24% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 38.03% | -15.14% | 36.39% | 100.36% | 22.06% | 28.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTAL and FICO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2011 | -0.26 |
The correlation between BTAL and FICO shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (5 years) to 0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTAL vs. FICO — Risk / Return Rank
BTAL
FICO
BTAL vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTAL | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.97 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.36 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | -0.68 | -0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTAL vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, smaller than the maximum FICO drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and FICO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTAL | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.70% | -79.26% | +26.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.57% | -50.93% | +16.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.83% | -61.28% | +13.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.83% | -61.28% | +13.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.70% | -61.28% | +8.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.55% | -46.95% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -18.12% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.40% | 26.42% | -8.02% |
Volatility
BTAL vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) is 7.95%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that BTAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTAL | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 11.12% | -3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.50% | 39.98% | -22.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.51% | 50.30% | -26.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 41.04% | -21.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 38.21% | -20.81% |
Dividends
BTAL vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison
BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, while FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 2.96% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTAL and FICO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICO has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to BTAL (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -52.70% vs FICO's -79.26%.
FICO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTAL and FICO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer