PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSSX vs. PZT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSSX vs. PZT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSSX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than PZT's 3.19% return.


BSSX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.73%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PZT

1D
0.31%
1M
1.45%
YTD
3.19%
6M
3.54%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
3.41%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSSX vs. PZT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
1.06%3.79%-0.09%7.50%
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.19%1.76%1.17%6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BSSX and PZT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.55

The correlation between BSSX and PZT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSSX vs. PZT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSSX
BSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PZT
PZT Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PZT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PZT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSSX vs. PZT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) and Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSSXPZTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.10

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

10.57

-3.86

BSSX vs. PZT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the PZT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSSX and PZT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSSXPZTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.07

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.38

+0.20

Drawdowns

BSSX vs. PZT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSSX drawdown since its inception was -8.12%, smaller than the maximum PZT drawdown of -22.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSSX and PZT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSSXPZTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-22.73%

+14.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-3.17%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-1.11%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-3.91%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.93%

+0.12%

Volatility

BSSX vs. PZT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) is 1.17%, while Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that BSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSSXPZTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

2.10%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

3.45%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

4.74%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

6.63%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.83%

6.96%

+0.87%

BSSX vs. PZT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSSX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PZT's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSSX vs. PZT - Dividend Comparison

BSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than PZT's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
3.30%3.27%3.29%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.57%3.43%3.04%2.82%2.66%2.77%2.55%2.73%3.01%2.94%3.36%3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSSX and PZT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZT has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to BSSX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSSX dropped -8.12% vs PZT's -22.73%.

On 1-year performance, PZT leads with 9.78% vs 7.02% for BSSX. On fees, BSSX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSSX has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PZT has performed better with a 9.78% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSSX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.

PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 3.30% for BSSX.

BSSX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2033 Index, while PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSSX and 0.28% for PZT.

BSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSSX and PZT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer