PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSSX vs. MUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSSX vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSSX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than MUB's 1.41% return.


BSSX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.73%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUB

1D
0.17%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.92%
1Y
6.87%
3Y*
3.41%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
2.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSSX vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
1.06%3.79%-0.09%7.50%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
1.41%3.78%1.26%4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BSSX and MUB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.64

The correlation between BSSX and MUB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSSX vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSSX
BSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MUB
MUB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSSX vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSSXMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.50

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.48

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

8.74

-2.03

BSSX vs. MUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSSX and MUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSSXMUBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.37

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Drawdowns

BSSX vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSSX drawdown since its inception was -8.12%, smaller than the maximum MUB drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSSX and MUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSSXMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-13.68%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-2.79%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.53%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-2.23%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.79%

+0.26%

Volatility

BSSX vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 0.98%. This indicates that BSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSSXMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.98%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

2.22%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

2.92%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

4.06%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.83%

4.92%

+2.91%

BSSX vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSSX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSSX vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

BSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than MUB's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
3.30%3.27%3.29%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
3.17%3.14%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSSX and MUB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSSX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to MUB (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSSX dropped -8.12% vs MUB's -13.68%.

On 1-year performance, BSSX leads with 7.02% vs 6.87% for MUB. On fees, MUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, MUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSSX has performed better with a 7.02% return vs 6.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSSX.

BSSX has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 3.17% for MUB.

BSSX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2033 Index, while MUB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSSX and 0.07% for MUB.

MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSSX and MUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer