PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSSX vs. IBMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSSX vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSSX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.73%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSSX vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSSX vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSSX
BSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSSX vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSSXIBMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

BSSX vs. IBMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSSXIBMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

BSSX vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSSX drawdown since its inception was -8.12%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSSX and IBMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSSXIBMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

0.00%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

0.00%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

0.00%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

Volatility

BSSX vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSSXIBMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

0.00%

+3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

0.00%

+7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.83%

0.00%

+7.83%

BSSX vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSSX and IBMM have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSSX vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

BSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
3.30%3.27%3.29%0.95%
IBMM
iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSSX and IBMM have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

BSSX has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

BSSX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2033 Index, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSSX and IBMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer