PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSPGX vs. BDBKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSPGX vs. BDBKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX) and iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSPGX achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than BDBKX's 19.35% return.


BSPGX

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.56%
6M
7.79%
YTD
9.35%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.86%

BDBKX

1D
1.37%
1M
-1.65%
6M
13.27%
YTD
19.35%
1Y
37.49%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
10.70%
ALL TIME*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BSPGX vs. BDBKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSPGX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G
9.35%17.85%24.96%26.27%-18.12%28.66%19.16%11.06%
BDBKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K
19.35%12.81%11.40%17.04%-20.32%14.59%20.02%7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between BSPGX and BDBKX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2019

0.81

The correlation between BSPGX and BDBKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSPGX vs. BDBKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSPGX
BSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BDBKX
BDBKX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BDBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BDBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSPGX vs. BDBKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX) and iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSPGXBDBKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.07

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

10.89

-2.05

BSPGX vs. BDBKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the BDBKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSPGX and BDBKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSPGX vs. BDBKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSPGX drawdown since its inception was -33.74%, smaller than the maximum BDBKX drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSPGX and BDBKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSPGXBDBKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.74%

-41.66%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-10.97%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-27.53%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-31.96%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-2.55%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-8.67%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

3.09%

-1.02%

Volatility

BSPGX vs. BDBKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX) is 3.44%, while iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K (BDBKX) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that BSPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDBKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSPGXBDBKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

3.79%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

14.10%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

19.36%

-6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

23.13%

-6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

23.68%

-3.78%

BSPGX vs. BDBKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSPGX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than BDBKX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSPGX vs. BDBKX - Dividend Comparison

BSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than BDBKX's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDBKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund Class K
2.73%3.17%4.84%2.96%1.76%7.67%1.45%3.47%4.29%3.18%4.62%3.64%
BSPGX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G
1.69%1.74%1.43%1.52%2.04%1.83%2.09%2.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSPGX and BDBKX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDBKX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to BSPGX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSPGX dropped -33.74% vs BDBKX's -41.66%.

BDBKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSPGX and BDBKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer