BSOL vs. BITQ
BSOL (Bitwise Solana Staking ETF) and BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Solana (SOL) spot price, while BITQ is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSOL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BITQ.
Performance
BSOL vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSOL achieves a -43.17% return, which is significantly lower than BITQ's 34.62% return.
BSOL
- 1D
- -5.48%
- 1M
- -18.32%
- YTD
- -43.17%
- 6M
- -43.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITQ
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 34.62%
- 6M
- 25.61%
- 1Y
- 49.39%
- 3Y*
- 53.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- —
BSOL vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF | -43.17% | -38.11% |
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 34.62% | -32.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSOL and BITQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSOL vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank
BSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITQ
BSOL vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSOL | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSOL vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSOL drawdown since its inception was -67.62%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSOL and BITQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSOL | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.62% | -90.32% | +22.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.83% | -17.24% | -47.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.95% | -52.52% | +5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.50% | — |
Volatility
BSOL vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSOL | BITQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.29% | 56.94% | +19.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 67.32% | +8.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 67.24% | +9.05% |
BSOL vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSOL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSOL vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSOL nor BITQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 3.12% |
BSOL Bitwise Solana Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSOL and BITQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSOL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSOL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BITQ.
BSOL and BITQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BITQ is Blockchain. BSOL tracks Solana (SOL) spot price, while BITQ tracks Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BSOL and 0.85% for BITQ.
Find the right allocation for BSOL and BITQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer