BSNSX vs. CCWSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSNSX (Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund) and CCWSX (Chautauqua International Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - BSNSX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Baird, while CCWSX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Baird. Over the past 5 years, BSNSX returned 2.10%/yr vs 3.27%/yr for CCWSX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSNSX charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CCWSX.

Performance

BSNSX vs. CCWSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (BSNSX) and Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSNSX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than CCWSX's -4.40% return.

BSNSX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 6.07%
• 3Y*: 4.47%
• 5Y*: 2.10%
• 10Y*: —

CCWSX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: -4.40%
• 6M: -3.21%
• 1Y: 1.91%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSNSX vs. CCWSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSNSX Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund	1.49%	4.83%	2.92%	6.53%	-5.54%	2.00%	8.13%	0.85%
CCWSX Chautauqua International Growth Fund	-4.40%	19.17%	11.30%	12.16%	-18.05%	6.62%	39.37%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BSNSX and CCWSX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019	0.16

Return for Risk

BSNSX vs. CCWSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSNSX

BSNSX Risk / Return Rank: 85
BSNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BSNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BSNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BSNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BSNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

CCWSX

CCWSX Risk / Return Rank: 3
CCWSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CCWSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CCWSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CCWSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CCWSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSNSX vs. CCWSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (BSNSX) and Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSNSX	CCWSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.67	0.08	+3.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.61	0.24	+5.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.99	1.03	+0.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	0.07	+3.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.98	0.19	+11.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSNSX vs. CCWSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSNSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the CCWSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSNSX and CCWSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSNSX	CCWSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.67	0.08	+3.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.18	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.54	+0.41

Drawdowns

BSNSX vs. CCWSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSNSX drawdown since its inception was -9.77%, smaller than the maximum CCWSX drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSNSX and CCWSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSNSX	CCWSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.77%	-34.59%	+24.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.81%	-19.75%	+17.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.54%	-19.75%	+16.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.77%	-34.59%	+24.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-8.59%	+8.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-8.88%	+7.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.50%	7.10%	-6.60%

Volatility

BSNSX vs. CCWSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (BSNSX) is 0.66%, while Chautauqua International Growth Fund (CCWSX) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that BSNSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCWSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSNSX	CCWSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.66%	4.34%	-3.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.27%	13.50%	-12.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64%	16.39%	-14.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.67%	18.22%	-15.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.36%	18.46%	-15.10%

BSNSX vs. CCWSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSNSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CCWSX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSNSX vs. CCWSX - Dividend Comparison

BSNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than CCWSX's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BSNSX Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund	3.35%	3.32%	3.28%	2.99%	1.84%	1.33%	1.99%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%
CCWSX Chautauqua International Growth Fund	1.49%	1.43%	0.45%	0.16%	0.80%	0.47%	0.28%	1.85%	2.25%	3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSNSX and CCWSX in my portfolio?

BSNSX and CCWSX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSNSX or CCWSX?

CCWSX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to BSNSX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSNSX dropped -9.77% vs CCWSX's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.