BSMZ vs. SPMO
BSMZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMZ is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMZ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
BSMZ vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMZ achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.45% return.
BSMZ
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 29.45%
- 6M
- 27.18%
- 1Y
- 41.07%
- 3Y*
- 42.30%
- 5Y*
- 22.83%
- 10Y*
- 20.99%
BSMZ vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.20% | 1.66% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.45% | -1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMZ and SPMO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMZ vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
BSMZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPMO
BSMZ vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSMZ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSMZ vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMZ drawdown since its inception was -3.26%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMZ and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMZ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -30.95% | +27.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.87% | +4.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -4.59% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
BSMZ vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMZ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 20.51% | -16.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 19.87% | -16.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 20.60% | -16.83% |
BSMZ vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMZ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSMZ vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
BSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.35% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.68% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMZ and SPMO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMZ.
BSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.68% for SPMO.
BSMZ is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SPMO is Momentum. BSMZ tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMZ and 0.13% for SPMO.
Find the right allocation for BSMZ and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer