BSMZ vs. IBMM
BSMZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - BSMZ tracks the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index while IBMM tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. Both are passively managed. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
BSMZ vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSMZ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMZ vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.82% |
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMZ vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMZ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMZ | IBMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BSMZ vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMZ drawdown since its inception was -3.26%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMZ and IBMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMZ | IBMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | 0.00% | -3.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | 0.00% | -0.70% |
Volatility
BSMZ vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMZ | IBMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 0.00% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 0.00% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 0.00% | +3.76% |
BSMZ vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSMZ and IBMM have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSMZ vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison
BSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BSMZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.02% | 0.68% |
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMZ and IBMM have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
BSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.
BSMZ tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2035 Index, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
Find the right allocation for BSMZ and IBMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer