PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMY vs. VTEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMY vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BSMY having a 1.43% return and VTEB slightly higher at 1.46%.


BSMY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.83%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTEB

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.89%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
2.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMY vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BSMY
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF
1.43%3.82%-1.86%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
1.46%3.72%-0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMY and VTEB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024

0.89

The correlation between BSMY and VTEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMY vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMY
BSMY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VTEB
VTEB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMY vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMYVTEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.58

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.65

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

9.41

-0.88

BSMY vs. VTEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the VTEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMY and VTEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMYVTEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.64

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.47

-0.10

Drawdowns

BSMY vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMY drawdown since its inception was -6.81%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMY and VTEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMYVTEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-17.00%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-2.71%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.52%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-2.33%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.76%

+0.19%

Volatility

BSMY vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) at 0.89%. This indicates that BSMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMYVTEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.89%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

2.01%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

2.72%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.23%

3.90%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

5.26%

-0.03%

BSMY vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMY vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison

BSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than VTEB's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMY
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF
3.53%3.31%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.35%3.29%3.14%2.79%2.09%1.64%1.99%2.30%2.25%1.96%1.66%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMY and VTEB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSMY has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to VTEB (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMY dropped -6.81% vs VTEB's -17.00%.

On 1-year performance, BSMY leads with 8.12% vs 7.14% for VTEB. On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTEB has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSMY has performed better with a 8.12% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMY.

BSMY has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 3.35% for VTEB.

BSMY tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2034 Index, while VTEB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMY and 0.03% for VTEB.

VTEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMY and VTEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer