PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMY vs. IBMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMY vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSMY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.83%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMY vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMY vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMY
BSMY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMY vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMYIBMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

BSMY vs. IBMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMYIBMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

Drawdowns

BSMY vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMY drawdown since its inception was -6.81%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMY and IBMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMYIBMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

0.00%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

0.00%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

0.00%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

BSMY vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMYIBMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

0.00%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.23%

0.00%

+5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

0.00%

+5.23%

BSMY vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSMY and IBMM have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMY vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

BSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSMY and IBMM have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

BSMY has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

BSMY tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2034 Index, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMY and IBMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer