BSMT vs. IBMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - BSMT tracks the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2029 Index while IBMM tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. Both are passively managed. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

BSMT vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSMT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.98%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: 3.19%
• 5Y*: -0.12%
• 10Y*: —

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMT vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BSMT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF	0.09%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

BSMT vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMT

BSMT Risk / Return Rank: 80
BSMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BSMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BSMT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BSMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BSMT Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMT vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMT	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.84	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMT	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	—	—

Drawdowns

BSMT vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMT drawdown since its inception was -16.20%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMT and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMT	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.20%	0.00%	-16.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	0.00%	-2.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	0.00%	-5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSMT	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85%	0.00%	+1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.25%	0.00%	+4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.42%	0.00%	+6.42%

BSMT vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSMT and IBMM have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSMT vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

BSMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF	2.74%	2.78%	2.80%	2.62%	1.65%	1.31%	1.82%	0.48%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BSMT or IBMM?

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMT or IBMM?

BSMT and IBMM have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMT or IBMM?

BSMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between BSMT and IBMM?

BSMT tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2029 Index, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.