PortfoliosLab logo
BSMT vs. BSMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BSMT and BSMS is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BSMT vs. BSMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BSMT:

0.50

BSMS:

0.85

Sortino Ratio

BSMT:

0.58

BSMS:

0.99

Omega Ratio

BSMT:

1.09

BSMS:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

BSMT:

0.21

BSMS:

0.36

Martin Ratio

BSMT:

1.49

BSMS:

2.82

Ulcer Index

BSMT:

1.27%

BSMS:

1.02%

Daily Std Dev

BSMT:

4.40%

BSMS:

3.80%

Max Drawdown

BSMT:

-16.19%

BSMS:

-14.96%

Current Drawdown

BSMT:

-6.90%

BSMS:

-4.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMT achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than BSMS's 0.34% return.


BSMT

YTD

-0.39%

1M

0.45%

6M

-1.34%

1Y

2.18%

3Y*

1.33%

5Y*

-0.03%

10Y*

N/A

BSMS

YTD

0.34%

1M

0.84%

6M

-0.44%

1Y

3.19%

3Y*

1.74%

5Y*

0.47%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSMT vs. BSMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSMT and BSMS have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BSMT vs. BSMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BSMT is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BSMT is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BSMT is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BSMT is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BSMT is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BSMT is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BSMS is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BSMS is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BSMS is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BSMS is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BSMS is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BSMS is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BSMT vs. BSMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BSMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the BSMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMT and BSMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BSMT vs. BSMS - Dividend Comparison

BSMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than BSMS's 2.84% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
BSMT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF
2.89%2.80%2.62%1.65%1.31%1.82%0.48%
BSMS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF
2.84%2.81%2.58%1.56%1.49%1.76%0.46%

Drawdowns

BSMT vs. BSMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMT drawdown since its inception was -16.19%, which is greater than BSMS's maximum drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMT and BSMS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BSMT vs. BSMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMT) is 0.81%, while Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that BSMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...