PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMR vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMR vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMR achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.


BSMR

1D
0.05%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.31%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMR vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
1.04%3.10%1.51%4.47%-7.60%1.09%4.97%0.16%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMR and XMMO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.10

BSMR vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSMR
XMMO

Financial Services

1.9%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

7.2%

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Energy

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

6.3%

Industrials

-

41.1%

Real Estate

-

6.1%

Technology

-

16.7%

Utilities

-

5.8%

Financial Services

BSMR
1.9%
XMMO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BSMR
0.0%
XMMO
4.6%

Basic Materials

BSMR

-

XMMO
7.2%

Communication Services

BSMR

-

XMMO
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

BSMR

-

XMMO
0.5%

Energy

BSMR

-

XMMO
7.7%

Healthcare

BSMR

-

XMMO
6.3%

Industrials

BSMR

-

XMMO
41.1%

Real Estate

BSMR

-

XMMO
6.1%

Technology

BSMR

-

XMMO
16.7%

Utilities

BSMR

-

XMMO
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMR vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMR
BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMR vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSMRXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.35

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.37

4.45

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.41

18.21

+5.19

BSMR vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMR and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMRXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

1.99

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.78

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.58

-0.36

Drawdowns

BSMR vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMR drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMR and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMRXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-55.37%

+41.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.57%

-8.34%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.50%

-24.93%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

-27.91%

+15.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-9.45%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

2.04%

-1.86%

Volatility

BSMR vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is 0.34%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that BSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMRXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

7.82%

-7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

15.54%

-14.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25%

18.71%

-17.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.03%

21.45%

-18.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.72%

22.27%

-16.55%

BSMR vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMR vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
2.72%2.77%2.78%2.72%1.40%1.00%1.49%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMR and XMMO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to BSMR (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMR dropped -13.49% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 16.69% vs 0.48% for BSMR. On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 0.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

BSMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

BSMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XMMO is Momentum. BSMR tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMR and 0.35% for XMMO.

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMR and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer