BSMR vs. SPHD
BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while SPHD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSMR returned 0.49%/yr vs 5.73%/yr for SPHD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
BSMR vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMR achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 5.32% return.
BSMR
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
BSMR vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.99% | 3.10% | 1.51% | 4.47% | -7.60% | 1.09% | 4.97% | 0.16% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 5.32% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 1.32% | 0.58% | 24.98% | -9.98% | 4.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMR and SPHD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.09 |
BSMR vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSMR
SPHD
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BSMR
SPHD
Consumer Cyclical
BSMR
SPHD
Basic Materials
BSMR
-
SPHD
-
Communication Services
BSMR
-
SPHD
Consumer Defensive
BSMR
-
SPHD
Energy
BSMR
-
SPHD
Healthcare
BSMR
-
SPHD
Industrials
BSMR
-
SPHD
Real Estate
BSMR
-
SPHD
Technology
BSMR
-
SPHD
Utilities
BSMR
-
SPHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMR vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
BSMR
SPHD
BSMR vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMR | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.33 | 0.84 | +2.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.56 | 1.30 | +4.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.15 | +0.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.29 | 1.25 | +6.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.18 | 3.16 | +20.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMR | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33 | 0.84 | +2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.41 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.58 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
BSMR vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMR drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMR and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMR | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.49% | -41.39% | +27.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.57% | -7.33% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.50% | -13.29% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.02% | -19.50% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -4.53% | +4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -4.70% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 2.91% | -2.73% |
Volatility
BSMR vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is 0.36%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that BSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMR | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 2.97% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.92% | 7.54% | -6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25% | 11.00% | -9.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.03% | 14.16% | -11.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 17.64% | -11.91% |
BSMR vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSMR vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than SPHD's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.72% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.72% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 1.49% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.58% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMR and SPHD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHD has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to BSMR (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMR dropped -13.49% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 5-year performance, SPHD leads with 5.73% vs 0.49% for BSMR. On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 5.73% return vs 0.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 2.72% for BSMR.
BSMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SPHD is S&P 500. BSMR tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while SPHD tracks S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMR and 0.30% for SPHD.
BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSMR and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer