BSMR vs. DCMT

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. BSMR is passively managed, while DCMT is actively managed. Over the past year, BSMR returned 3.05% vs 30.32% for DCMT. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BSMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

BSMR vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMR achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 26.67% return.

BSMR

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.90%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 1Y: 3.05%
• 3Y*: 2.83%
• 5Y*: 0.35%
• 10Y*: —

DCMT

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 21.69%
• YTD: 26.67%
• 1Y: 30.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMR vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	1.20%	3.10%	1.73%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	26.67%	6.04%	3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMR and DCMT is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	-0.08

Return for Risk

BSMR vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMR

BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 92
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 55
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMR vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSMR	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	1.62	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	2.23	+1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.28	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.41	1.91	+3.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.03	6.85	+10.18

BSMR vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMR Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMR and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSMR vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMR drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMR and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMR	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.49%	-15.96%	+2.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.57%	-15.96%	+15.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-9.07%	+8.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.43%	-3.52%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	4.44%	-4.26%

Volatility

BSMR vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is 0.37%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that BSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSMR	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	6.00%	-5.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.94%	16.87%	-15.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27%	18.77%	-17.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.02%	16.02%	-13.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.68%	16.02%	-10.34%

BSMR vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSMR vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than DCMT's 2.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	2.71%	2.77%	2.78%	2.72%	1.40%	1.00%	1.49%	0.45%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.90%	3.67%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMR and DCMT in my portfolio?

BSMR and DCMT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSMR or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to BSMR (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMR dropped -13.49% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, BSMR or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 30.32% vs 3.05% for BSMR. On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSMR or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 30.32% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMR or DCMT?

BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMR or DCMT?

DCMT has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.71% for BSMR.

What is the main difference between BSMR and DCMT?

BSMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMR and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.