PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMR vs. BLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMR vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMR achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than BLOX's 14.14% return.


BSMR

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.38%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*

BLOX

1D
-2.16%
1M
1.81%
YTD
14.14%
6M
8.96%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMR vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSMR and BLOX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMR vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMR
BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOX
BLOX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMR vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSMRBLOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.12

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.78

0.55

+6.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.35

1.11

+20.24

BSMR vs. BLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the BLOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMR and BLOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSMR vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMR drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum BLOX drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMR and BLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMRBLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-47.09%

+33.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.57%

-47.09%

+46.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-21.10%

+21.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-18.66%

+15.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

23.45%

-23.27%

Volatility

BSMR vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is 0.42%, while Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) has a volatility of 15.68%. This indicates that BSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMRBLOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

15.68%

-15.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

41.09%

-40.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28%

54.17%

-52.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

53.89%

-50.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.70%

53.89%

-48.19%

BSMR vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSMR vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison

BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than BLOX's 40.47% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
40.47%22.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BSMR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF
2.71%2.77%2.78%2.72%1.40%1.00%1.49%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMR and BLOX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLOX has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to BSMR (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMR dropped -13.49% vs BLOX's -47.09%.

On 1-year performance, BLOX leads with 25.91% vs 3.82% for BSMR. On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLOX has performed better with a 25.91% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 40.47%, compared with 2.71% for BSMR.

BSMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BLOX is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMR and 1.03% for BLOX.

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMR and BLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer