PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMP vs. SUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMP vs. SUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSMP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SUB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.88%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*
1.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMP vs. SUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
0.00%2.27%2.46%3.14%-5.09%0.60%4.91%0.62%
SUB
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
0.78%3.64%2.17%2.91%-2.05%0.03%2.51%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMP and SUB is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between BSMP and SUB has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMP vs. SUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SUB
SUB Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUB Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMP vs. SUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSMPSUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.60

BSMP vs. SUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSMP vs. SUB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMPSUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

Volatility

BSMP vs. SUB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMPSUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

BSMP vs. SUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SUB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMP vs. SUB - Dividend Comparison

BSMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SUB's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
1.05%2.35%2.53%2.20%1.23%0.72%1.32%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUB
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
2.53%2.42%2.10%1.73%0.86%0.72%1.23%1.58%1.32%0.95%0.75%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMP and SUB have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMP.

SUB has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.05% for BSMP.

BSMP tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2025 Index, while SUB tracks ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMP and 0.07% for SUB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMP and SUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer