BSMP vs. SUB
BSMP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF) and SUB (iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - BSMP tracks the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2025 Index while SUB tracks the ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMP charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SUB.
Performance
BSMP vs. SUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSMP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
BSMP vs. SUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.00% | 2.27% | 2.46% | 3.14% | -5.09% | 0.60% | 4.91% | 0.62% |
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 0.78% | 3.64% | 2.17% | 2.91% | -2.05% | 0.03% | 2.51% | 0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMP and SUB is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BSMP and SUB has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSMP vs. SUB — Risk / Return Rank
BSMP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SUB
BSMP vs. SUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSMP | SUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.58 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSMP vs. SUB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMP | SUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.15% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.91% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility
BSMP vs. SUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSMP | SUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.02% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 2.60% | — |
BSMP vs. SUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SUB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSMP vs. SUB - Dividend Comparison
BSMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SUB's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.05% | 2.35% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 1.23% | 0.72% | 1.32% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 2.53% | 2.42% | 2.10% | 1.73% | 0.86% | 0.72% | 1.23% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.95% | 0.75% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSMP and SUB have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMP.
SUB has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.05% for BSMP.
BSMP tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2025 Index, while SUB tracks ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMP and 0.07% for SUB.
Find the right allocation for BSMP and SUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer