PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMP vs. RVNU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMP vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSMP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RVNU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
6M
3.32%
YTD
4.29%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
3.24%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMP vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
0.00%2.27%2.46%3.14%-5.09%0.60%4.91%0.62%
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
4.29%0.58%1.46%11.19%-16.60%2.28%6.54%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMP and RVNU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between BSMP and RVNU has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMP vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RVNU
RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMP vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSMPRVNUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

BSMP vs. RVNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSMP vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMPRVNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

Volatility

BSMP vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMPRVNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.24%

BSMP vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMP vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

BSMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than RVNU's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
1.05%2.35%2.53%2.20%1.23%0.72%1.32%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.53%3.46%3.06%2.79%2.81%2.18%2.43%2.75%2.76%2.49%2.72%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMP and RVNU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BSMP.

RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 1.05% for BSMP.

BSMP tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2025 Index, while RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMP and 0.15% for RVNU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMP and RVNU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer