PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSMP vs. AMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSMP vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSMP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMUN

1D
0.02%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.13%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMP vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSMP and AMUN is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSMP vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSMP vs. AMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSMPAMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.07

Drawdowns

BSMP vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSMPAMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

Volatility

BSMP vs. AMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSMPAMUNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.00%

BSMP vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUN's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSMP vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison

BSMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than AMUN's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AMUN
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF
1.89%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BSMP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF
1.27%2.35%2.53%2.20%1.23%0.72%1.32%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSMP and AMUN have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSMP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSMP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMUN.

AMUN has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.27% for BSMP.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMP and 0.25% for AMUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSMP and AMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer