BSMC vs. ISVL
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL).
BSMC and ISVL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSMC is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023. ISVL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index. It was launched on Mar 23, 2021.
Performance
BSMC vs. ISVL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSMC vs. ISVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 4.40% | 15.52% | 10.21% | 11.69% |
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 1.12% | 42.84% | 4.58% | 16.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMC achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than ISVL's 1.12% return.
BSMC
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISVL
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 33.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSMC vs. ISVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMC has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ISVL's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSMC vs. ISVL — Risk / Return Rank
BSMC
ISVL
BSMC vs. ISVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMC | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 1.91 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 2.63 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.41 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.59 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 10.59 | -2.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMC | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.91 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.63 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMC and ISVL is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BSMC vs. ISVL - Dividend Comparison
BSMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than ISVL's 2.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.00% | 1.17% | 1.02% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISVL iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 2.66% | 2.69% | 3.92% | 3.82% | 3.37% | 2.82% |
Drawdowns
BSMC vs. ISVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMC drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, smaller than the maximum ISVL drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMC and ISVL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMC | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -30.48% | +11.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -12.48% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -8.78% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -6.79% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 3.06% | +0.01% |
Volatility
BSMC vs. ISVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) is 5.58%, while iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that BSMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSMC | ISVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 7.55% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 10.84% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.31% | 17.65% | +1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 16.75% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 16.74% | -0.47% |