BSJX vs. XMMO
BSJX (Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJX is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the IVZ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2033 Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
BSJX vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 24.24% return.
BSJX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 24.24%
- 6M
- 24.41%
- 1Y
- 38.04%
- 3Y*
- 32.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.79%
- 10Y*
- 19.68%
BSJX vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSJX Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.24% | 5.46% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 24.24% | 11.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJX and XMMO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.59 |
BSJX vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSJX
XMMO
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
BSJX
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
BSJX
XMMO
Technology
BSJX
XMMO
Industrials
BSJX
XMMO
Communication Services
BSJX
XMMO
Basic Materials
BSJX
XMMO
Healthcare
BSJX
XMMO
Financial Services
BSJX
XMMO
Utilities
BSJX
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
BSJX
XMMO
Real Estate
BSJX
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJX vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
BSJX
XMMO
BSJX vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJX | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.58 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
BSJX vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJX drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJX and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJX | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -55.37% | +51.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | 0.00% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -9.45% | +9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
BSJX vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJX | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 18.70% | -14.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.31% | 21.44% | -17.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.31% | 22.26% | -17.95% |
BSJX vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJX vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
BSJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJX Invesco BulletShares 2033 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.43% | 4.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJX and XMMO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJX.
BSJX has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
BSJX is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XMMO is Momentum. BSJX tracks IVZ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2033 Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJX and 0.35% for XMMO.
Find the right allocation for BSJX and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer