BSJW vs. OILK
BSJW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJW is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BSJW returned 7.00% vs 58.99% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. BSJW charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
BSJW vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJW achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
BSJW
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJW vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BSJW Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.79% | 9.85% | 3.62% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | -3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJW and OILK is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BSJW and OILK has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.34, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
BSJW vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSJW
OILK
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSJW
OILK
Energy
BSJW
OILK
-
Industrials
BSJW
OILK
-
Communication Services
BSJW
OILK
-
Financial Services
BSJW
OILK
-
Healthcare
BSJW
OILK
-
Technology
BSJW
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
BSJW
OILK
-
Basic Materials
BSJW
OILK
-
Real Estate
BSJW
OILK
-
Utilities
BSJW
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJW vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
BSJW
OILK
BSJW vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 3.42 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | 6.91 | +3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 2.06 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.12 | +1.31 |
Drawdowns
BSJW vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJW drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJW and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -83.76% | +79.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.22% | -17.35% | +14.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -3.66% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -32.61% | +32.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 8.56% | -7.86% |
Volatility
BSJW vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) is 1.22%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that BSJW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJW | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 10.44% | -9.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.26% | 23.26% | -20.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 28.75% | -24.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 30.12% | -25.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.12% | 35.97% | -30.85% |
BSJW vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJW has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJW vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
BSJW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJW Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.65% | 6.36% | 4.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJW and OILK have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to BSJW (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJW dropped -4.52% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 7.00% for BSJW. On fees, BSJW is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJW has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSJW is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 6.65% for BSJW.
BSJW is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while OILK is Oil & Gas. BSJW tracks Nasdaq BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJW and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJW and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer