PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJW vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJW vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJW achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 9.76% return.


BSJW

1D
0.04%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.21%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PPA

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.95%
YTD
9.76%
6M
7.56%
1Y
26.02%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
18.41%
10Y*
17.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJW vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSJW and PPA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2024

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJW vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJW
BSJW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BSJW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJW vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJWPPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.91

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.67

5.29

+3.37

BSJW vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJW Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJW and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJW vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJW drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJW and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJWPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-57.37%

+52.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-13.71%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-7.37%

+7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-9.18%

+8.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

4.93%

-4.22%

Volatility

BSJW vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJW) is 1.16%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that BSJW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJWPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

8.40%

-7.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.36%

17.09%

-13.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

20.15%

-15.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

18.70%

-13.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.10%

20.73%

-15.63%

BSJW vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJW has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJW vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

BSJW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than PPA's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.63%6.36%4.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.37%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJW and PPA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to BSJW (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJW dropped -4.52% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 1-year performance, PPA leads with 26.02% vs 6.11% for BSJW. On fees, BSJW is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJW has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PPA has performed better with a 26.02% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSJW is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

BSJW has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 0.37% for PPA.

BSJW is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. BSJW tracks Nasdaq BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJW and 0.58% for PPA.

BSJW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJW and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer