BSJV vs. SPHQ
BSJV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJV is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BSJV returned 6.50% vs 23.69% for SPHQ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
BSJV vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJV achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.16% return.
BSJV
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.83%
- 5Y*
- 14.67%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
BSJV vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJV Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 5.66% | 7.24% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.16% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJV and SPHQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023 | 0.60 |
The correlation between BSJV and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSJV vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSJV
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
BSJV
SPHQ
Industrials
BSJV
SPHQ
Energy
BSJV
SPHQ
Healthcare
BSJV
SPHQ
Financial Services
BSJV
SPHQ
Basic Materials
BSJV
SPHQ
Real Estate
BSJV
SPHQ
-
Communication Services
BSJV
SPHQ
Technology
BSJV
SPHQ
Utilities
BSJV
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
BSJV
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJV vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
BSJV
SPHQ
BSJV vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.32 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.67 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 11.39 | -2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.89 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.53 | +0.90 |
Drawdowns
BSJV vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJV drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJV and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -57.83% | +52.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -8.90% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -10.70% | +9.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 2.08% | -1.33% |
Volatility
BSJV vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) is 1.25%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that BSJV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 3.33% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.32% | 10.18% | -6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 12.62% | -8.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 16.45% | -10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 17.86% | -11.70% |
BSJV vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJV vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
BSJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJV Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.58% | 6.52% | 6.67% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJV and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to BSJV (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJV dropped -5.22% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 1-year performance, SPHQ leads with 23.69% vs 6.50% for BSJV. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BSJV has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 23.69% return vs 6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJV.
BSJV has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.
BSJV is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SPHQ is S&P 500. BSJV tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJV and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJV and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer