PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJV vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJV vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJV achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.16% return.


BSJV

1D
0.16%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.78%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPHQ

1D
0.59%
1M
6.34%
YTD
16.16%
6M
16.98%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJV vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSJV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.11%9.50%5.66%7.24%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.16%13.25%25.44%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJV and SPHQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.60

The correlation between BSJV and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSJV vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJV
SPHQ

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
4.6%

Industrials

6.8%
24.3%

Energy

6.3%
0.7%

Healthcare

4.5%
8.4%

Financial Services

4.3%
13.3%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Communication Services

2.5%
2.0%

Technology

2.5%
28.1%

Utilities

2.1%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJV
7.5%
SPHQ
4.6%

Industrials

BSJV
6.8%
SPHQ
24.3%

Energy

BSJV
6.3%
SPHQ
0.7%

Healthcare

BSJV
4.5%
SPHQ
8.4%

Financial Services

BSJV
4.3%
SPHQ
13.3%

Basic Materials

BSJV
3.5%
SPHQ
2.2%

Real Estate

BSJV
2.8%
SPHQ

-

Communication Services

BSJV
2.5%
SPHQ
2.0%

Technology

BSJV
2.5%
SPHQ
28.1%

Utilities

BSJV
2.1%
SPHQ
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

BSJV
1.0%
SPHQ
15.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJV vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJV
BSJV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BSJV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJV Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJV vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJVSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.67

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.74

11.39

-2.66

BSJV vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJV and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJVSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.89

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

0.53

+0.90

Drawdowns

BSJV vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJV drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJV and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJVSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-57.83%

+52.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-8.90%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-10.70%

+9.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

2.08%

-1.33%

Volatility

BSJV vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) is 1.25%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that BSJV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJVSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

3.33%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.32%

10.18%

-6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

12.62%

-8.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.16%

16.45%

-10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

17.86%

-11.70%

BSJV vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJV vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

BSJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.58%6.52%6.67%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.03%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJV and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to BSJV (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJV dropped -5.22% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 1-year performance, SPHQ leads with 23.69% vs 6.50% for BSJV. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BSJV has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 23.69% return vs 6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJV.

BSJV has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.

BSJV is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SPHQ is S&P 500. BSJV tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJV and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJV and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer