BSJV vs. HYLB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BSJV (Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BSJV tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031 while HYLB tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BSJV returned 6.50% vs 6.78% for HYLB. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSJV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.

Performance

BSJV vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJV achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than HYLB's 1.65% return.

BSJV

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYLB

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 8.79%
• 5Y*: 4.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJV vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSJV Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.11%	9.50%	5.66%	7.24%
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.65%	8.74%	8.14%	6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJV and HYLB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023	0.89

The correlation between BSJV and HYLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BSJV vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJV

BSJV Risk / Return Rank: 45
BSJV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BSJV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BSJV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BSJV Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
BSJV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

HYLB

HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 62
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJV vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSJV	HYLB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.84	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.79	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	3.00	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.74	12.90	-4.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSJV vs. HYLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the HYLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJV and HYLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSJV	HYLB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	1.84	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.58	+0.84

Drawdowns

BSJV vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJV drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJV and HYLB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJV	HYLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.22%	-22.91%	+17.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.21%	-2.27%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.09%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.79%	-2.43%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	0.53%	+0.22%

Volatility

BSJV vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) at 1.19%. This indicates that BSJV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSJV	HYLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	1.19%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.32%	2.92%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.37%	3.70%	+0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.16%	7.47%	-1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.16%	8.18%	-2.02%

BSJV vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJV vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison

BSJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than HYLB's 6.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSJV Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.58%	6.52%	6.67%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.48%	6.29%	6.31%	5.84%	5.53%	4.45%	5.22%	5.71%	5.95%	5.85%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSJV and HYLB in my portfolio?

BSJV and HYLB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSJV or HYLB?

BSJV has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to HYLB (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJV dropped -5.22% vs HYLB's -22.91%.

Which ETF is better, BSJV or HYLB?

On 1-year performance, HYLB leads with 6.78% vs 6.50% for BSJV. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSJV or HYLB?

Over the 1-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJV or HYLB?

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJV or HYLB?

BSJV has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 6.48% for HYLB.

What is the main difference between BSJV and HYLB?

BSJV tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2031, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJV and 0.15% for HYLB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.