PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJU vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJU vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJU achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 11.04% return.


BSJU

1D
0.17%
1M
0.39%
6M
1.68%
YTD
2.20%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
8.40%
5Y*
10Y*

SPHD

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.18%
6M
9.58%
YTD
11.04%
1Y
12.21%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
7.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJU vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.20%8.58%8.20%12.91%-2.11%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
11.04%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJU and SPHD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between BSJU and SPHD has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJU vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJU
BSJU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BSJU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJU Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJU vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJUSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.18

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

1.67

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

4.10

+7.57

BSJU vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJU Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJU and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJU vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJU drawdown since its inception was -7.51%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJU and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJUSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-41.39%

+33.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-7.33%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.09%

-13.29%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.63%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-4.68%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

2.99%

-2.45%

Volatility

BSJU vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) is 0.75%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that BSJU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJUSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

4.82%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

8.70%

-5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

11.70%

-7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.81%

14.20%

-6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.81%

17.64%

-9.83%

BSJU vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJU vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

BSJU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than SPHD's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.63%6.52%7.08%6.74%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.48%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJU and SPHD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHD has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to BSJU (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJU dropped -7.51% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 3-year performance, SPHD leads with 12.09% vs 8.40% for BSJU. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BSJU has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJU.

BSJU has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 4.48% for SPHD.

BSJU is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SPHD is Dividend. BSJU tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJU and 0.30% for SPHD.

BSJU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJU and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer