PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJU vs. BSJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJU vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJU achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than BSJR's 1.07% return.


BSJU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.59%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
10Y*

BSJR

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.52%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJU vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.21%8.58%8.20%12.91%-2.11%
BSJR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.07%7.41%7.15%11.91%-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJU and BSJR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.91

The correlation between BSJU and BSJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSJU vs. BSJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJU
BSJR

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
11.2%

Energy

7.8%
4.3%

Healthcare

5.2%
2.7%

Financial Services

4.1%
13.8%

Industrials

3.2%
10.3%

Real Estate

3.2%
4.2%

Technology

3.0%
1.6%

Communication Services

2.4%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.6%

Utilities

1.0%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJU
9.1%
BSJR
11.2%

Energy

BSJU
7.8%
BSJR
4.3%

Healthcare

BSJU
5.2%
BSJR
2.7%

Financial Services

BSJU
4.1%
BSJR
13.8%

Industrials

BSJU
3.2%
BSJR
10.3%

Real Estate

BSJU
3.2%
BSJR
4.2%

Technology

BSJU
3.0%
BSJR
1.6%

Communication Services

BSJU
2.4%
BSJR
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

BSJU
2.0%
BSJR
1.8%

Basic Materials

BSJU
1.9%
BSJR
1.6%

Utilities

BSJU
1.0%
BSJR
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJU vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJU
BSJU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BSJU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJU Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJR
BSJR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BSJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJR Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJU vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJUBSJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.19

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.57

19.27

-6.70

BSJU vs. BSJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJU Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the BSJR Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJU and BSJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJUBSJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.31

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.43

+0.54

Drawdowns

BSJU vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJU drawdown since its inception was -7.51%, smaller than the maximum BSJR drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJU and BSJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJUBSJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-22.58%

+15.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-1.16%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.12%

-3.15%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.31%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-3.25%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.25%

+0.29%

Volatility

BSJU vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) at 0.58%. This indicates that BSJU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJUBSJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.58%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

1.47%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

2.13%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.90%

6.73%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.90%

9.36%

-1.46%

BSJU vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSJU and BSJR have an expense ratio of 0.42%.


Dividends

BSJU vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison

BSJU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than BSJR's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSJR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.75%6.19%6.75%6.48%5.37%4.49%4.53%1.20%
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.66%6.52%7.08%6.74%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJU and BSJR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSJU has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to BSJR (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJU dropped -7.51% vs BSJR's -22.58%.

On 3-year performance, BSJU leads with 8.46% vs 7.78% for BSJR. Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. On volatility, BSJR has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSJU has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 7.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSJU and BSJR have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.

BSJU has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 5.75% for BSJR.

BSJU tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index.

BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJU and BSJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer