BSJT vs. SPY
BSJT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJT is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSJT returned 8.46%/yr vs 22.35%/yr for SPY. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJT charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
BSJT vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.
BSJT
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
BSJT vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJT Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.21% | 7.63% | 8.01% | 13.59% | -14.85% | -0.52% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 6.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJT and SPY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between BSJT and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSJT vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSJT
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
BSJT
SPY
Technology
BSJT
SPY
Energy
BSJT
SPY
Industrials
BSJT
SPY
Communication Services
BSJT
SPY
Real Estate
BSJT
SPY
Financial Services
BSJT
SPY
Basic Materials
BSJT
SPY
Utilities
BSJT
SPY
Healthcare
BSJT
SPY
Consumer Defensive
BSJT
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJT vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
BSJT
SPY
BSJT vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.43 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 3.16 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.40 | 14.72 | -3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.38 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.59 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
BSJT vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.62% | -55.19% | +35.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.47% | -8.88% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.59% | -18.76% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.70% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -9.05% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 1.91% | -1.33% |
Volatility
BSJT vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 0.97%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 2.84% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 8.90% | -6.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 11.83% | -8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 17.05% | -8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 17.94% | -9.73% |
BSJT vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJT vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJT Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.76% | 6.77% | 6.65% | 6.42% | 5.45% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJT and SPY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to BSJT (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJT dropped -19.62% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 3-year performance, SPY leads with 22.35% vs 8.46% for BSJT. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BSJT has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPY has performed better with a 22.35% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJT.
BSJT has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
BSJT is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SPY is S&P 500. BSJT tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJT and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJT and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer