PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJT vs. LQDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSJT vs. LQDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSJT vs. LQDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
-0.40%7.63%8.01%13.59%-2.59%
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
0.09%9.05%2.60%3.99%-6.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than LQDW's 0.09% return.


BSJT

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.80%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
10Y*

LQDW

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
0.09%
6M
1.24%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSJT vs. LQDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDW's 0.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BSJT vs. LQDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJT
BSJT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BSJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDW
LQDW Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LQDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDW Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDW Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJT vs. LQDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJTLQDWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

1.86

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.99

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.61

8.21

+0.40

BSJT vs. LQDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the LQDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJT and LQDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJTLQDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.42

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between BSJT and LQDW is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BSJT vs. LQDW - Dividend Comparison

BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, less than LQDW's 14.96% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.85%6.77%6.65%6.42%5.45%1.20%
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
14.96%16.02%15.74%19.28%8.85%0.00%

Drawdowns

BSJT vs. LQDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, which is greater than LQDW's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and LQDW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJTLQDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-9.20%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.15%

-3.14%

-1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.49%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-2.42%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.76%

+0.06%

Volatility

BSJT vs. LQDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 1.82%, while iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSJTLQDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

2.27%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

2.79%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.45%

4.44%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.33%

5.55%

+2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

5.55%

+2.78%