BSJS vs. FSYD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and FSYD (Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. BSJS is passively managed, while FSYD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSJS returned 8.32%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for FSYD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSJS charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FSYD.

Performance

BSJS vs. FSYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJS achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than FSYD's 3.35% return.

BSJS

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: 6.48%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: —

FSYD

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 9.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJS vs. FSYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.67%	8.31%	7.38%	12.28%	-8.95%
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	3.35%	9.09%	8.74%	12.22%	-6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJS and FSYD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022	0.86

The correlation between BSJS and FSYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSJS vs. FSYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSJS	FSYD
Healthcare	10.5%	94.6%
Industrials	9.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	-
Communication Services	5.5%	0.0%
Energy	5.4%	34.4%
Financial Services	4.6%	-
Technology	4.5%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

BSJS vs. FSYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJS

BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 78
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FSYD

FSYD Risk / Return Rank: 79
FSYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FSYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FSYD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FSYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FSYD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJS vs. FSYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSJS	FSYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.49	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	3.79	-0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.50	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	3.83	+0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.33	15.34	+3.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSJS vs. FSYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FSYD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJS and FSYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSJS	FSYD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	2.49	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.77	-0.25

Drawdowns

BSJS vs. FSYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, which is greater than FSYD's maximum drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and FSYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJS	FSYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.73%	-12.11%	-5.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.64%	-2.67%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.44%	-5.49%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.27%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-2.40%	-1.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	0.67%	-0.33%

Volatility

BSJS vs. FSYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is 0.72%, while Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that BSJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSJS	FSYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.72%	1.12%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.03%	3.13%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84%	4.12%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.39%	7.85%	-0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.14%	7.85%	-0.71%

BSJS vs. FSYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FSYD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJS vs. FSYD - Dividend Comparison

BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, which matches FSYD's 6.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.27%	6.49%	7.04%	6.75%	5.82%	4.86%	0.75%
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	6.32%	6.49%	6.47%	6.70%	5.29%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSJS and FSYD in my portfolio?

BSJS and FSYD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSJS or FSYD?

FSYD has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to BSJS (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs FSYD's -12.11%.

Which ETF is better, BSJS or FSYD?

On 3-year performance, FSYD leads with 9.54% vs 8.32% for BSJS. On fees, BSJS is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSJS or FSYD?

Over the 3-year period, FSYD has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJS or FSYD?

BSJS is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FSYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJS or FSYD?

FSYD has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 6.27% for BSJS.

What is the main difference between BSJS and FSYD?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.55% for FSYD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.