PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJQ vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJQ vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJQ achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


BSJQ

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.28%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
6.94%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJQ vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
0.85%6.59%7.49%9.83%-7.35%4.53%3.86%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJQ and QQQM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.62

The correlation between BSJQ and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSJQ vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJQ
QQQM

Financial Services

39.0%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
12.3%

Technology

5.0%
53.8%

Real Estate

3.6%
0.1%

Industrials

2.1%
2.8%

Communication Services

1.8%
15.8%

Energy

1.6%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

BSJQ
39.0%
QQQM
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJQ
7.0%
QQQM
12.3%

Technology

BSJQ
5.0%
QQQM
53.8%

Real Estate

BSJQ
3.6%
QQQM
0.1%

Industrials

BSJQ
2.1%
QQQM
2.8%

Communication Services

BSJQ
1.8%
QQQM
15.8%

Energy

BSJQ
1.6%
QQQM
0.6%

Basic Materials

BSJQ

-

QQQM
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

BSJQ

-

QQQM
7.7%

Healthcare

BSJQ

-

QQQM
4.2%

Utilities

BSJQ

-

QQQM
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJQ vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJQ
BSJQ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BSJQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJQ vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJQQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.45

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.57

3.53

+5.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.55

13.52

+28.03

BSJQ vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJQ and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJQQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

2.65

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.82

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.85

-0.31

Drawdowns

BSJQ vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJQ drawdown since its inception was -24.13%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJQ and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJQQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.13%

-35.04%

+10.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.54%

-11.96%

+11.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-22.70%

+20.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.95%

-35.04%

+23.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.20%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-8.25%

+6.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.11%

3.11%

-3.00%

Volatility

BSJQ vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) is 0.54%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that BSJQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJQQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

4.48%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.98%

12.05%

-11.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38%

15.91%

-14.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

22.24%

-16.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.45%

22.12%

-13.67%

BSJQ vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJQ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJQ vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

BSJQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
5.83%6.10%6.58%6.58%5.58%4.27%4.64%4.59%2.39%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJQ and QQQM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to BSJQ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJQ dropped -24.13% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 3.74% for BSJQ. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJQ.

BSJQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.83%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

BSJQ is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJQ and 0.15% for QQQM.

BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJQ and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer