PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJP vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJP vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSJP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJP vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.46%8.07%10.41%-5.16%4.57%4.16%16.89%-4.66%0.35%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJP and XMMO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.53

The correlation between BSJP and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSJP vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJP
XMMO

Financial Services

95.2%
2.4%

Industrials

4.7%
41.1%

Energy

0.1%
7.7%

Basic Materials

-

7.2%

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

6.3%

Real Estate

-

6.1%

Technology

-

16.7%

Utilities

-

5.8%

Financial Services

BSJP
95.2%
XMMO
2.4%

Industrials

BSJP
4.7%
XMMO
41.1%

Energy

BSJP
0.1%
XMMO
7.7%

Basic Materials

BSJP

-

XMMO
7.2%

Communication Services

BSJP

-

XMMO
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJP

-

XMMO
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

BSJP

-

XMMO
0.5%

Healthcare

BSJP

-

XMMO
6.3%

Real Estate

BSJP

-

XMMO
6.1%

Technology

BSJP

-

XMMO
16.7%

Utilities

BSJP

-

XMMO
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJP vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJP

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJP vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSJP vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJPXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

BSJP vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJPXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

Volatility

BSJP vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJPXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

BSJP vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJP vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.26%4.50%6.25%7.07%5.37%4.27%4.96%5.49%5.84%1.32%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJP and XMMO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJP.

BSJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

BSJP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XMMO is Momentum. BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJP and 0.35% for XMMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJP and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer