PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJP vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJP vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSJP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMMO

1D
-0.38%
1M
2.67%
YTD
22.42%
6M
19.70%
1Y
34.20%
3Y*
30.88%
5Y*
15.62%
10Y*
20.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJP vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.46%8.07%10.41%-5.16%4.57%4.16%16.89%-4.66%0.43%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
22.42%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJP and XMMO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between BSJP and XMMO has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJP vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJP vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJPXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.27

BSJP vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJP vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJPXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

Volatility

BSJP vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJPXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

BSJP vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJP vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than XMMO's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.89%4.50%6.25%7.07%5.37%4.27%4.96%5.49%5.84%1.32%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.57%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJP and XMMO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJP.

BSJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.57% for XMMO.

BSJP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XMMO is Momentum. BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJP and 0.35% for XMMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJP and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer