PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJP vs. FHYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJP vs. FHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSJP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FHYS

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.49%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJP vs. FHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.46%8.07%10.41%-5.16%0.63%
FHYS
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF
1.48%7.72%7.23%10.88%-7.31%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJP and FHYS is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021

0.76

The correlation between BSJP and FHYS shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSJP vs. FHYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJP
FHYS

Financial Services

95.2%

-

Industrials

4.7%
8.3%

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

91.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BSJP
95.2%
FHYS

-

Industrials

BSJP
4.7%
FHYS
8.3%

Energy

BSJP
0.1%
FHYS

-

Basic Materials

BSJP

-

FHYS

-

Communication Services

BSJP

-

FHYS
91.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJP

-

FHYS

-

Consumer Defensive

BSJP

-

FHYS

-

Healthcare

BSJP

-

FHYS

-

Real Estate

BSJP

-

FHYS

-

Technology

BSJP

-

FHYS

-

Utilities

BSJP

-

FHYS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJP vs. FHYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJP

FHYS
FHYS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJP vs. FHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP) and Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSJP vs. FHYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJPFHYSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

Drawdowns

BSJP vs. FHYS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJPFHYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

Volatility

BSJP vs. FHYS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJPFHYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.95%

BSJP vs. FHYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FHYS's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJP vs. FHYS - Dividend Comparison

BSJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than FHYS's 5.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.26%4.50%6.25%7.07%5.37%4.27%4.96%5.49%5.84%1.32%
FHYS
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.77%5.96%6.42%6.76%6.25%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJP and FHYS have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSJP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSJP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for FHYS.

FHYS has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 2.26% for BSJP.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJP and 0.51% for FHYS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJP and FHYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer