BSEP vs. FFTY
BSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSEP is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSEP returned 10.76%/yr vs -0.60%/yr for FFTY. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSEP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
BSEP vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSEP achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.11% return.
BSEP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
BSEP vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 6.73% | 14.80% | 16.96% | 20.94% | -9.20% | 14.64% | 12.44% | 7.23% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 20.11% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -51.08% | 11.92% | 18.20% | 3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSEP and FFTY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between BSEP and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSEP vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSEP
FFTY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
BSEP
FFTY
Financial Services
BSEP
FFTY
Communication Services
BSEP
FFTY
Consumer Cyclical
BSEP
FFTY
Healthcare
BSEP
FFTY
Industrials
BSEP
FFTY
Consumer Defensive
BSEP
FFTY
-
Energy
BSEP
FFTY
Utilities
BSEP
FFTY
Real Estate
BSEP
FFTY
-
Basic Materials
BSEP
FFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSEP vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
BSEP
FFTY
BSEP vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSEP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.20 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 1.65 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.58 | 4.36 | +13.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSEP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 1.12 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | -0.02 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.20 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
BSEP vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSEP drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSEP and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSEP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -59.46% | +35.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -23.29% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.36% | -29.60% | +16.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -59.46% | +44.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -15.34% | +15.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -22.38% | +19.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 8.77% | -7.63% |
Volatility
BSEP vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) is 1.02%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that BSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSEP | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 9.42% | -8.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.82% | 26.18% | -20.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 34.09% | -26.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.61% | 29.14% | -17.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 27.41% | -13.64% |
BSEP vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSEP vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
BSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.12% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSEP and FFTY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to BSEP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSEP dropped -23.98% vs FFTY's -59.46%.
On 5-year performance, BSEP leads with 10.76% vs -0.60% for FFTY. On fees, BSEP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSEP has performed better with a 10.76% return vs -0.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSEP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for BSEP.
BSEP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. BSEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BSEP and 0.80% for FFTY.
BSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSEP and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer