BSEP vs. BMAR
BSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) and BMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BSEP tracks the S&P 500 Index while BMAR tracks the S&P 500 Price Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSEP returned 10.62%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for BMAR. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BSEP vs. BMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSEP achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than BMAR's 7.31% return.
BSEP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
BMAR
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 18.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- —
BSEP vs. BMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 6.02% | 14.80% | 16.96% | 20.94% | -9.20% | 14.64% | 18.60% |
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 7.31% | 14.97% | 16.49% | 23.09% | -7.06% | 16.79% | 12.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSEP and BMAR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between BSEP and BMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSEP vs. BMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSEP
BMAR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BSEP
BMAR
Financial Services
BSEP
BMAR
Communication Services
BSEP
BMAR
Consumer Cyclical
BSEP
BMAR
Healthcare
BSEP
BMAR
Industrials
BSEP
BMAR
Consumer Defensive
BSEP
BMAR
Energy
BSEP
BMAR
Utilities
BSEP
BMAR
Real Estate
BSEP
BMAR
Basic Materials
BSEP
BMAR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSEP vs. BMAR — Risk / Return Rank
BSEP
BMAR
BSEP vs. BMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSEP | BMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.51 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.37 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.41 | 18.64 | -2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSEP | BMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.54 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.05 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.96 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
BSEP vs. BMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSEP drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, which is greater than BMAR's maximum drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSEP and BMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSEP | BMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -21.43% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -5.64% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.36% | -12.86% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -15.02% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.46% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -2.34% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 1.02% | +0.12% |
Volatility
BSEP vs. BMAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) is 1.26%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that BSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSEP | BMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 1.79% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.89% | 6.05% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.81% | 7.47% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 11.33% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 13.67% | +0.09% |
BSEP vs. BMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSEP and BMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BSEP vs. BMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSEP nor BMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BSEP and BMAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BMAR has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to BSEP (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSEP dropped -23.98% vs BMAR's -21.43%.
On 5-year performance, BMAR leads with 11.86% vs 10.62% for BSEP. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BMAR has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSEP and BMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BSEP and BMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BSEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while BMAR tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index.
BMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSEP and BMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer