BSEP vs. BJUL
BSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) and BJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BSEP tracks the S&P 500 Index while BJUL tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSEP returned 10.62%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for BJUL. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BSEP vs. BJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BSEP having a 6.02% return and BJUL slightly lower at 5.85%.
BSEP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
BJUL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- —
BSEP vs. BJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 6.02% | 14.80% | 16.96% | 20.94% | -9.20% | 14.64% | 12.44% | 6.84% |
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July | 5.85% | 13.93% | 18.41% | 21.73% | -7.38% | 10.77% | 9.05% | 7.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSEP and BJUL is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between BSEP and BJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSEP vs. BJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSEP
BJUL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BSEP
BJUL
Financial Services
BSEP
BJUL
Communication Services
BSEP
BJUL
Consumer Cyclical
BSEP
BJUL
Healthcare
BSEP
BJUL
Industrials
BSEP
BJUL
Consumer Defensive
BSEP
BJUL
Energy
BSEP
BJUL
Utilities
BSEP
BJUL
Real Estate
BSEP
BJUL
Basic Materials
BSEP
BJUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSEP vs. BJUL — Risk / Return Rank
BSEP
BJUL
BSEP vs. BJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSEP | BJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.30 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.41 | 17.12 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSEP | BJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.37 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.99 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.73 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
BSEP vs. BJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSEP drawdown since its inception was -23.98%, roughly equal to the maximum BJUL drawdown of -24.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSEP and BJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSEP | BJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.98% | -24.03% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -5.40% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.36% | -14.06% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -14.06% | -0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.45% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -2.49% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 1.04% | +0.10% |
Volatility
BSEP vs. BJUL - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) at 0.88%. This indicates that BSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSEP | BJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 0.88% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.89% | 5.54% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.81% | 7.51% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 11.61% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 13.63% | +0.13% |
BSEP vs. BJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSEP and BJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BSEP vs. BJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither BSEP nor BJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BSEP and BJUL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSEP has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to BJUL (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSEP dropped -23.98% vs BJUL's -24.03%.
On 5-year performance, BJUL leads with 11.41% vs 10.62% for BSEP. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BJUL has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSEP and BJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BSEP and BJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BSEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while BJUL tracks S&P 500.
BSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSEP and BJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer