PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. VCLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSCZ vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSCZ vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than VCLT's -0.63% return.


BSCZ

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VCLT

1D
0.78%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
-1.73%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSCZ vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. VCLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZVCLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.39

+0.95

Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and VCLT is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than VCLT's 5.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
3.25%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.62%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and VCLT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZVCLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-34.31%

+31.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-15.73%

+13.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.58%

-8.08%

+7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSCZVCLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

10.22%

-5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

12.81%

-7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

12.84%

-7.86%