PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCZ vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 61.64% return.


BSCZ

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.51%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
-0.82%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.19%

SOXQ

1D
1.04%
1M
-9.38%
6M
40.74%
YTD
61.64%
1Y
107.64%
3Y*
46.52%
5Y*
28.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.07M$1.98M$1.86M
$211.18M$220.46M$283.01M

BSCZ vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and SOXQ is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSCZ
BSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSCZ vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCZSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.38

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.79

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.68

15.50

-13.82

BSCZ vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCZ and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-46.01%

+42.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-28.56%

+25.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-21.83%

+19.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-12.92%

+12.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

6.97%

-5.73%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) is 1.34%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 16.48%. This indicates that BSCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCZSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

16.48%

-15.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.94%

37.48%

-33.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.91%

43.45%

-38.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.97%

38.30%

-33.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

37.92%

-32.95%

BSCZ vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than SOXQ's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
4.62%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.32%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCZ and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (16.48%) compared to BSCZ (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCZ dropped -3.28% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 1-year performance, SOXQ leads with 107.64% vs 2.08% for BSCZ. On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 107.64% return vs 2.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.

BSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.32% for SOXQ.

BSCZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCZ and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer