PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCZ vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


BSCZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCZ vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and OILK is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

-0.41

BSCZ vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCZ
OILK

Healthcare

12.1%

-

Communication Services

10.8%

-

Technology

10.5%

-

Financial Services

9.8%

-

Energy

8.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
100.0%

Industrials

7.3%

-

Utilities

5.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Healthcare

BSCZ
12.1%
OILK

-

Communication Services

BSCZ
10.8%
OILK

-

Technology

BSCZ
10.5%
OILK

-

Financial Services

BSCZ
9.8%
OILK

-

Energy

BSCZ
8.9%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSCZ
7.4%
OILK
100.0%

Industrials

BSCZ
7.3%
OILK

-

Utilities

BSCZ
5.0%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

BSCZ
4.6%
OILK

-

Real Estate

BSCZ
3.5%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

BSCZ
1.7%
OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.12

+1.10

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-83.76%

+80.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-3.66%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-32.61%

+31.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.56%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCZOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

28.75%

-23.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

30.12%

-25.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

35.97%

-30.99%

BSCZ vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
4.09%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCZ and OILK have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 4.09% for BSCZ.

BSCZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while OILK is Oil & Gas. BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.68% for OILK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCZ and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer