BSCZ vs. MILK
BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and MILK (Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCZ tracks the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index while MILK tracks the Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MILK.
Performance
BSCZ vs. MILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than MILK's 2.18% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MILK
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 9.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCZ vs. MILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 5.67% |
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF | 2.18% | 5.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and MILK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. MILK — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
MILK
BSCZ vs. MILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | MILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.97 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. MILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum MILK drawdown of -6.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and MILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | MILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -6.16% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.24% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -1.09% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.04% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. MILK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | MILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 5.21% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 6.69% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 6.69% | -1.71% |
BSCZ vs. MILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MILK's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. MILK - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than MILK's 7.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 2.18% |
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF | 7.04% | 6.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, BSCZ and MILK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MILK.
MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 4.09% for BSCZ.
BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.49% for MILK.
Find the right allocation for BSCZ and MILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer