PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. MILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCZ vs. MILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than MILK's 2.18% return.


BSCZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MILK

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.10%
YTD
2.18%
6M
1.55%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCZ vs. MILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and MILK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. MILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

MILK
MILK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. MILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. MILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZMILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.97

+0.24

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. MILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum MILK drawdown of -6.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and MILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZMILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-6.16%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-0.24%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-1.09%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. MILK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCZMILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

5.21%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

6.69%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

6.69%

-1.71%

BSCZ vs. MILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MILK's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. MILK - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than MILK's 7.04% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BSCZ and MILK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MILK.

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 4.09% for BSCZ.

BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.49% for MILK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCZ and MILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer