BSCZ vs. BBCB
BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and BBCB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCZ tracks the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index while BBCB tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBCB.
Performance
BSCZ vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.82% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBCB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCZ vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 5.67% |
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 2.82% | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and BBCB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.97 |
BSCZ vs. BBCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCZ
BBCB
Healthcare
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Healthcare
BSCZ
BBCB
Communication Services
BSCZ
BBCB
Technology
BSCZ
BBCB
Financial Services
BSCZ
BBCB
Energy
BSCZ
BBCB
Consumer Cyclical
BSCZ
BBCB
Industrials
BSCZ
BBCB
Utilities
BSCZ
BBCB
Consumer Defensive
BSCZ
BBCB
Real Estate
BSCZ
BBCB
Basic Materials
BSCZ
BBCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
BBCB
BSCZ vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.46 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and BBCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -22.48% | +19.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.34% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -6.66% | +5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.83% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 4.93% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 7.25% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 7.50% | -2.52% |
BSCZ vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than BBCB's 7.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 7.15% | 5.02% | 5.22% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.47% | 4.59% | 5.25% | 0.20% |
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BSCZ and BBCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCZ.
BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 4.09% for BSCZ.
BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while BBCB tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.09% for BBCB.
Find the right allocation for BSCZ and BBCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer