PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. BBCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCZ vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.82% return.


BSCZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBCB

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.82%
6M
2.66%
1Y
8.37%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCZ vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and BBCB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.97

BSCZ vs. BBCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCZ
BBCB

Healthcare

12.1%
8.8%

Communication Services

10.8%
6.7%

Technology

10.5%
7.8%

Financial Services

9.8%
21.9%

Energy

8.9%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
6.3%

Industrials

7.3%
7.1%

Utilities

5.0%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
5.1%

Real Estate

3.5%
3.8%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.6%

Healthcare

BSCZ
12.1%
BBCB
8.8%

Communication Services

BSCZ
10.8%
BBCB
6.7%

Technology

BSCZ
10.5%
BBCB
7.8%

Financial Services

BSCZ
9.8%
BBCB
21.9%

Energy

BSCZ
8.9%
BBCB
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCZ
7.4%
BBCB
6.3%

Industrials

BSCZ
7.3%
BBCB
7.1%

Utilities

BSCZ
5.0%
BBCB
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

BSCZ
4.6%
BBCB
5.1%

Real Estate

BSCZ
3.5%
BBCB
3.8%

Basic Materials

BSCZ
1.7%
BBCB
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

BBCB
BBCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. BBCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZBBCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.46

+0.76

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and BBCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZBBCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-22.48%

+19.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-0.34%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-6.66%

+5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCZBBCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

4.93%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

7.25%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

7.50%

-2.52%

BSCZ vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than BBCB's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
7.15%5.02%5.22%4.22%3.39%3.47%4.59%5.25%0.20%
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
4.09%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BSCZ and BBCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCZ.

BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 4.09% for BSCZ.

BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while BBCB tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.09% for BBCB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCZ and BBCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer