PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCY vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCY vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCY) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCY achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.40% return.


BSCY

1D
0.07%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.71%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VCIT

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.50%
1Y
6.39%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
2.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCY vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCY and VCIT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024

0.98

The correlation between BSCY and VCIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCY vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCY
BSCY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BSCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCY Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCY vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCY) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCYVCITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.57

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

2.32

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.10

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.20

7.05

+0.15

BSCY vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCY Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCY and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCYVCITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.57

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.76

+0.34

Drawdowns

BSCY vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCY drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCY and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCYVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-20.56%

+15.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.96%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-1.14%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-3.16%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.88%

+0.05%

Volatility

BSCY vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCY) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.39%. This indicates that BSCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCYVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.39%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.33%

3.07%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

4.10%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

6.61%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.62%

6.28%

-0.66%

BSCY vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCY has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCY vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

BSCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than VCIT's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCY
Invesco BulletShares 2034 Corporate Bond ETF
4.86%4.79%2.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.79%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BSCY and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BSCY has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to VCIT (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCY dropped -5.44% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 1-year performance, BSCY leads with 6.86% vs 6.39% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSCY has performed better with a 6.86% return vs 6.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCY.

BSCY has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 4.79% for VCIT.

BSCY tracks Nasdaq BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2034 Index, while VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCY and 0.04% for VCIT.

VCIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCY and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer