BSCW vs. VXUS
BSCW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCW is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSCW returned 5.57%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for VXUS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
BSCW vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCW achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return.
BSCW
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
BSCW vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.16% | 9.00% | 2.20% | 9.31% | 0.31% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | 4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCW and VXUS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.39 |
BSCW vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCW
VXUS
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
BSCW
VXUS
Financial Services
BSCW
VXUS
Healthcare
BSCW
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
BSCW
VXUS
Communication Services
BSCW
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
BSCW
VXUS
Industrials
BSCW
VXUS
Real Estate
BSCW
VXUS
Energy
BSCW
VXUS
Utilities
BSCW
VXUS
Basic Materials
BSCW
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCW vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
BSCW
VXUS
BSCW vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.85 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 11.14 | -4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.12 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.39 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
BSCW vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCW drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCW and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -35.97% | +27.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -11.27% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.24% | -13.58% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.99% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -8.22% | +6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 2.88% | -2.02% |
Volatility
BSCW vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) is 1.20%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that BSCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 5.60% | -4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 13.00% | -10.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 15.21% | -11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 16.05% | -8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 17.16% | -9.92% |
BSCW vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCW vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
BSCW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.83% | 4.81% | 5.06% | 4.80% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCW and VXUS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to BSCW (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCW dropped -8.32% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 3-year performance, VXUS leads with 19.30% vs 5.57% for BSCW. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, BSCW has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 19.30% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCW.
BSCW has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.
BSCW is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VXUS is Global Equities. BSCW tracks Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCW and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCW and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer