BSCW vs. QCON
BSCW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. BSCW is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. BSCW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
BSCW vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BSCW
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 5.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCW vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | -0.43% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
BSCW vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCW
QCON
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Technology
BSCW
QCON
-
Financial Services
BSCW
QCON
Healthcare
BSCW
QCON
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSCW
QCON
-
Communication Services
BSCW
QCON
-
Consumer Defensive
BSCW
QCON
-
Industrials
BSCW
QCON
Real Estate
BSCW
QCON
-
Energy
BSCW
QCON
-
Utilities
BSCW
QCON
Basic Materials
BSCW
QCON
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCW vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
BSCW
QCON
BSCW vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCW | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCW | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | — | — |
Drawdowns
BSCW vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCW drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCW and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCW | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | 0.00% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | 0.00% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | 0.00% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility
BSCW vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCW | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 0.00% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 0.00% | +7.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.24% | 0.00% | +7.24% |
BSCW vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCW vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
BSCW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.83% | 4.81% | 5.06% | 4.80% | 1.12% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BSCW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
BSCW has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCW and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for BSCW and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer