BSCW vs. JAAA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSCW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCW is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. BSCW is passively managed, while JAAA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSCW returned 5.57%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for JAAA. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JAAA.

Performance

BSCW vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCW achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than JAAA's 1.87% return.

BSCW

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 0.15%
• 1Y: 5.82%
• 3Y*: 5.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JAAA

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: 6.71%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCW vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF	0.16%	9.00%	2.20%	9.31%	0.31%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	1.87%	5.16%	7.43%	8.59%	1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCW and JAAA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022	0.04

Return for Risk

BSCW vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCW

BSCW Risk / Return Rank: 44
BSCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BSCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
BSCW Omega Ratio Rank: 42
BSCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BSCW Martin Ratio Rank: 43

JAAA

JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 98
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCW vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCW	JAAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	5.98	-4.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	10.04	-7.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	2.69	-1.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	13.07	-10.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.80	70.18	-63.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSCW vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCW Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 5.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCW and JAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCW	JAAA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	5.98	-4.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	2.77	-2.00

Drawdowns

BSCW vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCW drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCW and JAAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCW	JAAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.32%	-2.64%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-0.39%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.24%	-1.46%	-5.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-0.02%	-1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-0.25%	-1.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.07%	+0.79%

Volatility

BSCW vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that BSCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSCW	JAAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	0.13%	+1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	0.64%	+2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87%	0.85%	+3.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.24%	1.68%	+5.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.24%	1.64%	+5.60%

BSCW vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than JAAA's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSCW vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

BSCW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than JAAA's 5.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSCW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF	4.83%	4.81%	5.06%	4.80%	1.12%	0.00%	0.00%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	5.00%	5.30%	6.35%	6.11%	2.74%	1.21%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCW and JAAA in my portfolio?

BSCW and JAAA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSCW or JAAA?

BSCW has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCW dropped -8.32% vs JAAA's -2.64%.

Which ETF is better, BSCW or JAAA?

On 3-year performance, JAAA leads with 6.71% vs 5.57% for BSCW. On fees, BSCW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSCW or JAAA?

Over the 3-year period, JAAA has performed better with a 6.71% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCW or JAAA?

BSCW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JAAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCW or JAAA?

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.83% for BSCW.

What is the main difference between BSCW and JAAA?

BSCW is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while JAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCW and 0.20% for JAAA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.98 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.