BSCV vs. XMMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO).
BSCV and XMMO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSCV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2031 Index. It was launched on Sep 15, 2021. XMMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. Both BSCV and XMMO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BSCV vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCV vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF | -0.29% | 9.04% | 2.62% | 9.16% | -16.90% | -1.62% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 4.93% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 4.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCV achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 4.93% return.
BSCV
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 4.31%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCV vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSCV vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
BSCV
XMMO
BSCV vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.86 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.28 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 10.83 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.54 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCV and XMMO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BSCV vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
BSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than XMMO's 0.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCV Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.71% | 4.65% | 4.87% | 4.47% | 3.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
BSCV vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCV drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCV and XMMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -55.37% | +32.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -12.81% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -4.39% | +2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -9.52% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 2.69% | -1.97% |
Volatility
BSCV vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) is 1.63%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that BSCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCV | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 9.07% | -7.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | 14.28% | -11.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 21.97% | -17.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 21.26% | -13.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 22.11% | -14.64% |