BSCU vs. SPHQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BSCU (Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCU is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCU returned 0.85%/yr vs 14.67%/yr for SPHQ. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCU charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.

Performance

BSCU vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCU achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.16% return.

BSCU

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.35%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 4.59%
• 3Y*: 5.57%
• 5Y*: 0.85%
• 10Y*: —

SPHQ

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 6.34%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 6M: 16.98%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: 22.83%
• 5Y*: 14.67%
• 10Y*: 15.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCU vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF	0.35%	8.24%	3.12%	8.66%	-15.08%	-3.02%	2.07%
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	16.16%	13.25%	25.44%	24.83%	-15.76%	28.03%	10.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCU and SPHQ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020	0.24

The correlation between BSCU and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (5 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSCU vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSCU	SPHQ
Healthcare	14.1%	8.4%
Financial Services	12.6%	13.3%
Technology	10.4%	28.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	4.6%
Energy	8.0%	0.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	15.4%
Industrials	6.4%	24.3%
Utilities	4.1%	1.0%
Real Estate	3.7%	-
Communication Services	3.7%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	2.2%

Return for Risk

BSCU vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCU

BSCU Risk / Return Rank: 46
BSCU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BSCU Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BSCU Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BSCU Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BSCU Martin Ratio Rank: 47

SPHQ

SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCU vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSCU	SPHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.89	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	2.73	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	2.67	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.62	11.39	-3.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSCU vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCU Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCU and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSCU	SPHQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	1.89	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.90	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.53	-0.47

Drawdowns

BSCU vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCU drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCU and SPHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSCU	SPHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.34%	-57.83%	+35.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.07%	-8.90%	+6.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.66%	-16.57%	+10.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.74%	-25.04%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	0.00%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.03%	-10.70%	+2.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	2.08%	-1.47%

Volatility

BSCU vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) is 0.85%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that BSCU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSCU	SPHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	3.33%	-2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	10.18%	-8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97%	12.62%	-9.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.61%	16.45%	-9.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.47%	17.86%	-11.39%

BSCU vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSCU vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

BSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF	4.62%	4.56%	4.70%	4.07%	3.06%	1.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.15%	1.42%	1.85%	1.19%	1.55%	1.51%	1.85%	1.57%	1.67%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSCU and SPHQ in my portfolio?

BSCU and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSCU or SPHQ?

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to BSCU (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCU dropped -22.34% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

Which ETF is better, BSCU or SPHQ?

On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.67% vs 0.85% for BSCU. On fees, BSCU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCU has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSCU or SPHQ?

Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.67% return vs 0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSCU or SPHQ?

BSCU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSCU or SPHQ?

BSCU has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.

What is the main difference between BSCU and SPHQ?

BSCU is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SPHQ is S&P 500. BSCU tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCU and 0.15% for SPHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.