BSCT vs. VCLT
BSCT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCT tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index while VCLT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSCT returned 0.81%/yr vs -3.49%/yr for VCLT. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BSCT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
BSCT vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCT achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than VCLT's -2.48% return.
BSCT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.31%
VCLT
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- 6M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -0.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- -3.49%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.80M | $10.07M | $10.38M | |
| $269.99M | $266.96M | $358.04M |
BSCT vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.79% | 7.51% | 3.45% | 8.61% | -12.88% | -2.13% | 10.83% | 1.72% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | -2.48% | 7.18% | -1.90% | 11.17% | -25.50% | -1.73% | 13.27% | 3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCT and VCLT is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between BSCT and VCLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCT vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
BSCT
VCLT
BSCT vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCT | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.02 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 0.16 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.21 | 0.35 | +7.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCT vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCT drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCT and VCLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCT | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -34.31% | +15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | -5.38% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.70% | -10.26% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.14% | -34.31% | +15.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -17.30% | +16.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -8.22% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | 2.43% | -1.97% |
Volatility
BSCT vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT) is 0.58%, while Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that BSCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCT | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 2.15% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.70% | 6.02% | -4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24% | 7.78% | -5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 12.75% | -7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 12.83% | -5.64% |
BSCT vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCT vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
BSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than VCLT's 5.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCT Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.53% | 4.51% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 1.94% | 2.24% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.18% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCT and VCLT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCLT has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to BSCT (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCT dropped -19.14% vs VCLT's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, BSCT leads with 0.81% vs -3.49% for VCLT. On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BSCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSCT has performed better with a 0.81% return vs -3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCT.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 4.57% for BSCT.
BSCT tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCT and 0.03% for VCLT.
BSCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCT and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer